Insightful Satire on Life


Saturday, March 4, 2017

Why I Think Elon Musk Will be the World’s First Trillionaire



I have been fascinated this week with Elon Musk and his futuristic companies. You may know that he is the founder of Telsa (high end electric cards and a solar company that he recently merged into it) and SpaceX, the current darling of the space community as it launches spaceships every couple of weeks (or at least that is the plan going forward).

But these companies won’t make him a trillionaire. Building rockets and luxury sports cars might make you a lot of money, but not that much. For one thing, competition will eventually make the margins too small. Right now, he is one of the only names in private rockets and high end electric cars, but this won’t be the case in a decade. And once more people enter the market, his profit margins will go down.

I do think, however, that he will become fabulously wealthy, but not for his futuristic companies. I think, instead, that he will make his real fortune (even though he is already fabulously wealthy), doing what man has been doing for thousands of years – digging tunnels. 

He recently created a new company, The Boring Company, whose goal is to tunnel deep under the ground at incredible speeds. He wants to make roads underground for cars, trains, and his hyperloop. Current boring machines can dig about 300 feet a week underground (basically 2-3 miles a year), he wants to do a mile a week.  And current tunneling costs are prohibitive - it can cost upwards of a billion dollars a mile at current prices. 

In short, he wants to be able to build a machine that could build an underground version of the DC Beltway in a year (at least lengthwise). 

Assuming he can do this (and since there hasn’t been a major advancement in tunnel construction for 50 years, I don’t see why he couldn’t), the applications for this kind of technology are incredible. 

First the cost savings would be huge. If he could increase the speed as much as he hopes, cutting the cost in half or more would not be unreasonable.  Instead of widening roads one lane at a time, you could create whole new freeways underground, without having to buy additional land, interfere with current traffic, or worry about environment impacts (except for additional cars on the roads of course!).

Even the environment impacts could be offset – the tunnels will need air pumped into and out of them, so you could theoretically filter the air when you pump it out, making these tunnels even more attractive to cities trying to keep their air ‘clean.’

Tunnels would never have issues with rain or snow. And the road surface would last much longer because it wouldn’t have to deal with those elements or the sun beating down on it. So they could save governments money by decreasing how often they repave roads and eliminating the needs for plow trucks in the winter.

You would have more space and more access control, so even for city traffic, you could eliminate stop lights, pedestrians, etc., making driving safer, easier, and faster. And as driving cars start rolling out, speeds could be significantly increased since the only obstacle would be other cars!

And these are just the benefits from the driving point of view. Since you have these tunnels, you likely don’t need all the head space for cars, so you could fill that with underground electric wiring, water piping, fiber optic cables, etc. Think of an airplane, but instead of overhead bins holding your luggage, they could hold these public and private utilities. Right now, adding new piping and cabling to current cities is prohibitively expensive and sometimes impossible. With these new tunnels, you can just tack it on the roof and you are good to go.

I was also reminded of the mining possibilities, but on earth and in space. With these machines, you could mine tons of dirt very quickly and process it above ground. You could also go deeper, and since you can process so much so quickly (likely with fewer workers), marginally productive mines would once again become profitable.

In space (Moon, asteroids, and maybe Mars), not only could you mine some of the precious metals there very quickly, but you could also quickly build massive underground habitats. These habitats would easily be big enough not only for large colonies of humans to live, but also provide them the space to be self-sufficient through growing their own food and having somewhere to store it, having space for their own factories, etc. It would also be radiation free (a big plus in space travel). They might even be able to have enough space to grown enough food for some level of livestock.

This technology could also be used for oil and gas pipelines. Instead of digging from the surface, or putting the pipe above ground where it is at risk of random damage (e.g. a bullet like what happened to the Alaska pipeline a few years ago), accidental damage (such as during nearby construction), or terrorism, it would be buried safely deep underground. The pipe would also be in a tunnel, so repairs and inspections would be much easier, and if there was a leak, it would still be contained within the tunnel itself! 

And then there are the numerous military applications of being able to be that deep with that much space.

So basically, and I know there are lots of ifs here, but this technology Musk is taking about creating could allow for the first fully self-sufficient colony on another planet, eliminate traffic congestion, and reduce pollution. 

If this isn’t a trillion dollar idea, I don’t know what is!

Sunday, February 26, 2017

The Solution to Washington Gridlock Doesn’t Lie in Washington




I am fascinated by the number of protests in the country. I find the parallels to the Tea Party protests in ’09 striking and compelling. Yet, while I feel that many of the protesters are bought and paid for, I am sure some of it is people being actually upset with Trump’s 4 weeks in office. At least with Obama we got to wait 3 years before someone mentioned impeachment – yet now a major contender for the DNC chairmanship was talking impeachment in the first week!

Yet, at the source, I think that the issue is more than just that the country is divided, that Washington is gridlocked, or that there is too many corrupt or bought out people. I believe the issue, at its source, is that too many decisions and policies are decided in Washington. 

You see, the 10th amendment was designed to keep the Federal Government from getting too big. Yet, it has never really been invoked. Yet, there is nothing in the Constitution about most of the major issues facing the country. There is nothing in the Constitution about marriage (ever get a Federal Marriage certificate?), education, abortion, crop regulations, Federal regulations of state lands, etc. Yet, all these issues, have become very divisive Federal issues.

The real solution to these issues is to discuss them at a state level. The reason people are so upset now, just like in ’09, is that they feel that they don’t have a voice. Which, in a country of 325 million people, if even 25% of the people are outraged, that would still be over 75 million people that are very upset!

So, instead of trying to find common ground on Capitol Hill, perhaps we could find common ground on a smaller Federal Government!

Monday, January 23, 2017

How Donald Trump Stole the Oldest Trick in the Democrat Playbook and No One Noticed



Over the weekend, the media and the Trump Administration had a major confrontation over the number of people who attended his inauguration. There is a picture showing crowds far smaller at Trump’s inauguration than those at Obama’s inauguration. Trump’s Press Secretary said it was the largest crowd ever. The coverage of this feud went on all weekend and into Monday when another advisor said that they were presenting ‘alternative facts.’

Now if it was me, I would have just said that there were more people who watched the inauguration on TV and the internet than any other inauguration in the past 34 years and that most of my supporters were too broke from the Obama economy to pay the sky-high prices of hotels and flights to DC. I would likely go on to say that by the time I was done, the job market would be doing so well they would be able to not only afford to come to DC for my 2nd inauguration, but they would be able to pay for their friends to come as well! But then again, I didn’t beat 16 Republican challengers and Her Royalness….

But then it hit me, Mr. Trump is playing the Democrats own game and winning. You see, over the weekend, no one was really talking anymore about him being illegitimate, the massive ‘(liberal) Women’s March’, the Federal Hiring Freeze, Trump limiting ObamaCare (including a likely decision to no longer enforce the individual mandate), that we pulled out TPP, and are pulling out of NAFTA. Nope, the whole conversation is about this controversy over crowd size.
Oh, and Trump is working to make America great again.

This play is almost identical to the Hillary Campaign’s response to their email hacking scandal and her private server issue. Instead of an airing and discussion of all the Democrats racist comments, protecting national security, rigging of the Democrat primary, and pay to play activities – which should have ended anyone’s career – we were instead discussing how the Russian’s rigged the election. Did anyone in the Government actually look at any forensic evidence of the Russian hack? Nope! But we didn’t discuss that either.

We just talked about the poor woman being beat up by the Russians. Always a winning story in American politics.

Oh, and that private server holding all kinds of state secrets? That was because she was busy and was just doing what was easiest and convenient. No talk of the obvious violations of numerous federal laws or what other pay to play schemes were in those 30,000+ deleted emails (hey, if they would talk about it on official party email accounts, why not a secret email account?).

Instead of talking about all those other issues, the conversation was just about how it came to be that we all learned about these emails.

Where Trump is really winning here is that unlike the Democrats, he is not trying to cover a scandal (who really cares how many people came to an inauguration and why does it even matter?), but instead he is providing himself cover from the liberal media while he institutes all sorts of things that would normally be wall to wall coverage and outrage!

Remember 6 months ago, when TPP was the only thing holding the Chinese back? Eh, no big deal anymore.

Or when ObamaCare was almost the third rail of politics, and everyone was beginning to think that it was set in stone? Yeah, that is on a death spiral now.

What about the ‘(liberal) Women’s March’? Shouldn’t that have been major news for days if not the week? That march feeds everything the mainstream media loves! But no, they are more concerned about catching Mr. Trump in a ‘lie.’ 

Sorry you 3 million ladies, you just got trumped by a small crowd story, and no one noticed!